Language evolution and human history: what a difference a date makes

Abstract

Historical inference is at its most powerful when independent lines of evidence can be integrated into a coherent account. Dating linguistic and cultural lineages can potentially play a vital role in the integration of evidence from linguistics, anthropology, archaeology and genetics. Unfortunately, although the comparative method in historical linguistics can provide a relative chronology, it cannot provide absolute date estimates and an alternative approach, called glottochronology, is fundamentally flawed. In this paper we outline how computational phylogenetic methods can reliably estimate language divergence dates and thus help resolve long-standing debates about human prehistory ranging from the origin of the Indo-European language family to the peopling of the Pacific.

Authors

Russell D. Gray, Quentin D. Atkinson, Simon J. Greenhill

Citation

Gray RD, Atkinson QD & Greenhill SJ. 2011. Language evolution and human history: what a difference a date makes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 366, 1090-1100.

Published 28 February 2011

@article{Gray2011,
  title = {Language evolution and human history: what a difference a date makes},
  author = {Gray, Russell D. and Atkinson, Quentin D. and Greenhill, Simon J.},
  journal = {Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences},
  volume = {366},
  number = {1567},
  pages = {1090--1100},
  publisher = {The Royal Society},
  year = {2011},
  doi = {10.1098/rstb.2010.0378},
  url = {https://simon.net.nz/articles/language-evolution-and-human-history-what-a-difference-a-date-makes/},
}

136 citations · FWCI 119.1 · top 1% cited · OpenAlex